We have recently had two more Big Y-700 tests complete in the Ackley surname project, and the results are quite interesting. These two tests resulted in the creation of a new branch and the splitting of a block in the Y haplotree, which will be described below.
The first test was for a U.S. man who is a descendant of Zebulon S. Ackley (1773-1813). This man's original Y-67 test matched all of the other Ackley men who are descendants of our immigrant ancestor Nicholas Ackley, but the connection between Zebulon and Nicholas is not known. He did a Big Y test hoping to learn more about how his line is connected to Nicholas. One prevalent (and most probably incorrect) theory found in many online trees is that Zebulon is the son of Jeremiah Ackley (1742-1761), who was the son of Nicholas Ackley (1708-1763). The younger Nicholas (referred to as Nicholas 2 from here on to distinguish him from the original Nicholas) was the son of James, Sr. (1677-1746). Many of the online trees with Jeremiah seem to have some of his facts confused with another Jeremiah Ackley who lived in Erie County, New York. In any case, although Zebulon's descendants are most surely descendants of Nicholas Ackley due to their Y-DNA matches with known Nicholas descendants, no clear path from Zebulon to Nicholas has been discovered yet.
The second test was for an English man who does not have the Ackley surname and who is not a descendant of Nicholas Ackley, but who matched a few of the Ackley men in the project at 67 and 111 markers. These matches were at high genetic distances, so were assumed to indicate a fairly distant relationship. Tools from Family Tree DNA indicated the common ancestor of this man and Nicholas Ackley's descendants was likely someone who lived around 1100 AD, which would pre-date Nicholas.
The results from these two tests can be summarized by looking at the block tree before and after the new tests, shown below with notes highlighting the changes.
Before and After Comparison of Ackley Branch of the Y Haplotree |
Block Split
New Branch
Practical Implications of These Results
The value of the new branch created with the results of the new U.S. tester is straightforward; the descendant of Zebulon is placed on the "James" branch of the haplotree, and in fact the new branch under James (R-FTD69462) can be labeled as the "Nicholas 2" branch since tester #754287 is a known descendant of James's son Nicholas 2. The missing connection between the new tester and Nicholas has now been narrowed down to finding which of Nicholas 2's (1708-1763) sons could have been the father of Zebulon since there is likely only one generation missing given the birth and death dates of the men who are now known to be on the path between Zebulon and Nicholas (1630-1695). The family tree below will be used to illustrate the situation.
Nicholas had 4 sons; with his first wife Jerusha Graves he had the previously mentioned Jeremiah (1742-1761) and Abel (1746-1838), and with his second wife Sarah Wilson he had Lewis (1758-1823) and Nicholas 3 (1762-). Lewis and Nicholas 3 seem unlikely to be Zebulon's father since they would have been 15 and 9 years old at the time of Zebulon's birth in 1773, and Jeremiah could not be the father since he died in 1761. This leaves Abel or another unknown son of Nicholas 2 as the only possibilities to be the father for Zebulon, and the search has been narrowed considerably.This situation is a great of example of traditional genealogy research and genetic genealogy coming together to solve a problem. Traditional research on the line of Zebulon Ackley reached a point where a brick wall was encountered, and DNA testing has filled in most of the gaps in the path from Zebulon to Nicholas. While the final answer has not yet been found, the descendant of Zebulon, tester #205619, has valuable information that will greatly narrow his search.
The Ackley portion of the haplotree has now developed to the point where new testers are likely to be placed on existing branches of members with known genealogies or create new sub-branches that could be helpful in solving brick wall genealogy problems. I would invite any Ackley man who has questions about his genealogy to consider joining the Ackley Surname Project at Family Tree DNA and taking a Y-DNA test.
Link of the Day
Below is link to the Ackley Surname Project for anyone who might be interested in learning more about the use of DNA testing in Ackley genealogy.
https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/ackley/about
Quote of the Day
"Success is walking from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm."
--Winston Churchill
I have an ancestry DNA activation kit. Just haven't gotten around to sending it in. I would like to be a part of the Ackley Surname Project. Tell me what to do.
ReplyDeleteThe Ackley Surname Project is at Family Tree DNA. If your DNA kit is from Ancestry, you can join the project, but it will be a 2-step process. You'll first have to follow the instructions for the Ancestry kit and send your sample to Ancestry. Once they process the kit and make the results available, you can download your results file from Ancestry and then upload it to Family Tree DNA. Once your results are uploaded to Family Tree DNA you can join the project. I should point out that the Ancestry test is an autosomal test while the results reported in this post are from Big Y tests. We have many project members who have done autosomal tests, but autosomal results do not factor into the building of the haplotree as described in this post.
Delete